I feel like Restall and Stern contrast a lot when it comes
to the discussion of the Black Legend. When Restall discusses the Conquest and
Colonialization of the South Americas, he describes it in a way such that the
perception that people had was that it was incredibly easy for the Spaniards. However,
as Restall continues he explains that this take over was not as easy as
perceived. Restall explains through his text that the conquest was not as easy
as it appeared, and that there were many native factors that had to do with this
glorious take over (from the Spaniard prospective) I think that this kind of
idea is shared in the Black Legend, in the sense that things were not as nice
and clean as perceived. The Black Legend speaks to the harsh reality of what
the conquest was like, as well as the religious influences that played a huge
part of the conflict not only with the natives, but the Spaniards themselves. The
Black Legend was also known for spreading propaganda throughout Europe promoting
the assimilation of the Native Culture, and promoting the spread of
Christianity in a positive way. Restall’s view of what actually happened is
very Black Legend-esk, and I would have to agree. Conflict is not good between
two kinds of people, but especially within the same side of a conflict.
No comments:
Post a Comment